Every engagement — individual or business — follows the same four-phase process: diagnose what is actually happening, design the better way forward, implement it under actual operating demands, and sustain the improvement over time. The context changes. The method does not.
1 Phase 01
Diagnose
Identify what is getting in the way. An honest read on the current state — where time, capacity, money, attention, progress, or performance are being lost.
Build the tools, workflows, routines, plans, or systems needed to improve execution. Built around the real person, team, or business.
Tools: process design · execution planning · standardization
3 Phase 03
Execute
Put it into practice and adjust what does not hold. Tested under actual workloads, timelines, people, pressure, and constraints until it actually holds.
outperform rate with structured execution triggers
Sources +
Primary source for every number. Peer-reviewed studies carry the most weight; industry research is labeled so you always know what kind of evidence supports each metric.
1Bloom, Eifert, Mahajan, McKenzie & Roberts. Management Practices in Indian Firms / “Does Management Matter?” Poor management practices are linked to informal execution, weak monitoring, and inconsistent systems. Peer-reviewed business researchView →
2Bloom et al. Structured management improvements raised profitability by 17% per year. Peer-reviewed / randomized business interventionView →
3McKinsey & Company. 22% of less data-driven companies had sales well above competitors. Industry research / executive surveyView →
4McKinsey & Company. 50% of analytics-driven companies had sales well above competitors. Industry research / executive surveyView →
5McKinsey & Company. 15% of less data-driven companies achieved above-average turnover growth. Industry research / executive surveyView →
6McKinsey & Company. 43% of analytics-driven companies achieved above-average turnover growth. Industry research / executive surveyView →
7McKinsey & Company. 18% of less data-driven companies reported significantly higher ROI. Industry research / executive surveyView →
8McKinsey & Company. 45% of analytics-driven companies reported significantly higher ROI. Industry research / executive surveyView →
9Kwiek & Roszka (2024). Top 10% of performers account for nearly 50% of total output. Bibliometric research / preprintView →
10The Times / Institute for Employment Studies. 25–40% of Fortune 500 companies invest in executive coaching for leadership performance support. Industry reporting / adoption proxyView →
11American Psychological Association. Task switching can cost up to 40% of productive time. Research summaryView →
12Aeon, Faber & Panaccio (2021). Time management is related to job performance at about r = .25, translated here as a ~57% outperform rate. Peer-reviewed meta-analysisView →
13Harkin et al. (2016). Private monitoring showed d+ = 0.19; lower-visibility / unrecorded monitoring translates to roughly a ~55–58% outperform range. Peer-reviewed meta-analysisView →
14Harkin et al. (2016). Progress-monitoring interventions showed d+ = 1.98 for increasing monitoring frequency and d+ = 0.40 for goal attainment, across 138 studies / 19,951 participants. Peer-reviewed meta-analysisView →
15Sheeran / Gollwitzer & Sheeran. Intentions explain only 28% of actual behavior. Peer-reviewed meta-analysisView →
These figures illustrate well-documented patterns, not guarantees. Individual results vary with the person, business, execution environment, and consistency of implementation.
Sample dashboard views: the tools you'll use and the progress the work produces, illustrated.
Results in motion · live mockups
Four ways to operate at a higher level.
Every client sees their progress documented like this — with the metrics they came in with, the work that moved the number, and the system that will keep it moving after the engagement closes. Roll over any column to pause the scroll.
For individualsHigh-performers turning goals into measurable progress
For businessesOwner-operated businesses building scalable operations
01 · Follow Through Project
60-day single goal
For individuals
Sample · 12-week recomp
Sample: 12-week recomp
Start
168.4
→
Now
158.1
→
Goal
158.0
Adherence · 14 weeks
Day streak84
SMART goal
Drop to 158lb · 22% bf by Jun 23
98% completeOn pace ↗
Weight · 14 weeks
Weekly check-in · 12 of 12
"Hit Sun meal-prep ritual for 3 weeks straight. Old pattern broken."
Sample · 12-week recomp
Sample: 12-week recomp
Start
168.4
→
Now
158.1
→
Goal
158.0
Adherence · 14 weeks
Day streak84
SMART goal
Drop to 158lb · 22% bf by Jun 23
98% completeOn pace ↗
Weight · 14 weeks
Weekly check-in · 12 of 12
"Hit Sun meal-prep ritual for 3 weeks straight. Old pattern broken."
60 days · 1 goalSee report →
02 · The Full Program
12-week multi-goal
For individuals
Sample · multi-dimension
Sample: 4-domain rebuild
Blended progress70%
Career · Senior PM
Start
0 apps
→
Now
34
→
Goal
40
Financial · runway
Start
$0
→
Now
$19K
→
Goal
$28K
Physical · 36 sessions
Completed30/36
Skill · AWS cert
Modules7/12
Weekly cadence
2 anchors/day across 4 dimensions. Built around her life, not on top of it.
Sample · multi-dimension
Sample: 4-domain rebuild
Blended progress70%
Career · Senior PM
Start
0 apps
→
Now
34
→
Goal
40
Financial · runway
Start
$0
→
Now
$19K
→
Goal
$28K
Physical · 36 sessions
Completed30/36
Skill · AWS cert
Modules7/12
Weekly cadence
2 anchors/day across 4 dimensions. Built around her life, not on top of it.
12 weeks · 4–5 goalsSee report →
03 · Phase 1 Diagnostic
2-week business audit
For businesses
Sample · diagnostic delivered
Sample: service-business audit
VSM · lead → cash
Lead
Intake51h
Quote
Reply
Booked
Lead time78h
Owner-time audit · 14 days
Hours / week71
IN the business58%
Hidden cost / yr$74K
5-Whys · proposal lag
Why 6 days? → estimator is bottleneck → no template library → no protected time → cost never quantified · until now.
Capability · parts variance
μ = 9.1% · 67% over USL
90-day plan attached
6 gaps · sequenced · payback < 7 mo
Sample · diagnostic delivered
Sample: service-business audit
VSM · lead → cash
Lead
Intake51h
Quote
Reply
Booked
Lead time78h
Owner-time audit · 14 days
Hours / week71
IN the business58%
Hidden cost / yr$74K
5-Whys · proposal lag
Why 6 days? → estimator is bottleneck → no template library → no protected time → cost never quantified · until now.